Make it make sense. All in one morning, I read Douglas Todd in the Sun, saying that developers are getting away with murder on Broadway, no requirements for nice streetscapes, parks, open spaces, etc - going to be a dark forest of towers, "like Metrotown".
Then I come here and read nobody can build because of all the requirements.
Do small-building developers need to band together into some sort of powerful lobby, like the Broadway guys presumably put together?
Thanks again. Good read. I agree we need to prioritize the outcomes. I think if view comes and shadowing are indeed the priority A outcomes, then city should be allowing density in more places. The TOA policy was a missed opportunity to do so.
Make it make sense. All in one morning, I read Douglas Todd in the Sun, saying that developers are getting away with murder on Broadway, no requirements for nice streetscapes, parks, open spaces, etc - going to be a dark forest of towers, "like Metrotown".
Then I come here and read nobody can build because of all the requirements.
Do small-building developers need to band together into some sort of powerful lobby, like the Broadway guys presumably put together?
Thanks again. Good read. I agree we need to prioritize the outcomes. I think if view comes and shadowing are indeed the priority A outcomes, then city should be allowing density in more places. The TOA policy was a missed opportunity to do so.