4 Comments

Do you see city council introducing similar zones with zero setbacks and appropriate FAR's, or has the recent multiplex program been a sign that our council is not willing to make the appropriate steps to help increase affordability?

Expand full comment
author

ABC just announced a motion to push for a number of housing policies. It doesn't include more city-wide missing-middle policies, but it does include speeding up of the "urban villages" in the Vancouver Plan, allowing 3- to 6-storey buildings and townhouses in certain specific areas.

Expand full comment

We need that red spike in "Multi-unit". Is it just upzoning? Is it just going to happen, now that you can put 3 units per lot?

Expand full comment
author

Yes, it's basically just upzoning. The city of Vancouver's multiplex program that council just approved is a step in that direction, but a very small step. Auckland has zones allowing five-storey apartment buildings by right, with zero setbacks.

In the equivalent of the multiplex zones, they allow three storeys with about one-third more floor space than Vancouver. (Vancouver allows a 1.0 floor space ratio, about 4000 square feet on a standard 33-foot lot. Auckland allows 45% site coverage and three storeys; I believe that's a floor space ratio of 1.35, or 5400 square feet on a 33-foot lot.) That doesn't just mean that each project gives you more floor space, it also means that more projects will happen, because a building with 5400 square feet is significantly more valuable than one with only 4000 square feet.

Expand full comment