Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Roy Brander's avatar

Thanks. For other readers, Austin TX has almost precisely 1M pop, so it would be at "18" on the second chart, whereas SF, CA, would be at 0.87M, and thus at 2 on the 2nd chart, a fifth of Vancouver's rate.

NB: SF is f****d.

Expand full comment
Roy Brander's avatar

So are the Edmontonians who were available in 2014 to be building 30% more housing than they are there now, available to move to Vancouver for a few years? How come Edmonton gets to spike up construction when it wants, and Vancouver can't seem to?

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts