Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Roy Brander's avatar

Have economists ever modelled how much downward pressure you'd get on rents from an actor willing to take even a small loss on building and renting? I think there's a lot of reluctance to build when there's no clear high profits to be had. (The "actor" I have in mind is government, of course, I don't believe in fairies.)

Expand full comment
Dale Hunter's avatar

Isn't it inevitable that rents will rise to match costs of owned housing, as new builds become a bigger proportion of the rental stock?

On another note, see Brian Palmquist's interesting piece (brianpalmquist@substack.com) on the new building at 2nd and Spruce, which was approved as 'affordable housing' 2.5 years ago, with $31.8 million in provincial funding, and where the cheapest STUDIO is $2499/mo. Affordable for a household income of about $100k/yr.

We seem to be in housing cloud cuckoo land... will any conventional calculations on the effect on cost of rentals of addition of new housing stock hold up in this environment?

Really heads should roll over the debacle on Spruce Street...

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts