Class C apartments get cheaper when there's a lot of new "luxury" Class A apartments
Housing is a ladder, it's all connected
When you build "luxury" new apartments in big numbers, the influx of supply puts downward pressure on rents at all price points -- even in the lowest-priced Class C rentals. Here's evidence of that happening right now:
There are 21 U.S. markets where Class C rents are falling at least 4% year over year. What is the common denominator? You guessed it: Supply. Of those, all but one have supply expansion rates ABOVE the U.S. average.
There's no demand issue in any of these 12 markets. They're all among the absorption leaders nationally -- places like Austin, Phoenix, Salt Lake City, Raleigh/Durham, Atlanta, Tampa, Dallas, Charlotte, Orlando, etc. But they all have a lot of new supply.
Simply put: Supply is doing what it's supposed to do when we build A LOT of apartments. It's a process academics call "filtering." New pricey apartments are pulling up higher-income renters out of moderately priced Class B units, which in turn cut rents to lure Class C renters, and on down the line it goes.
Lest anyone is still in doubt, here's another factoid: Where are Class C rents growing most? You guessed it (I hope!) -- in markets with little new supply. Class C rent growth topped 4% in 22 of the nation's 150 largest metro areas, and nearly all of them have limited new apartment supply.
Most new construction tends to be Class A "luxury" because that's what pencils out due to high cost of everything from land to labor to materials to impact fees to insurance to taxes, etc.
So critics will say: "We don't need more luxury apartments!"
Yes, you do. Because when you build "luxury" apartments at scale, you will put downward pressure on rents at all price points.
More
Housing is a ladder - it's all connected. New housing frees up older housing. Conversely, not building new housing results in a shortage of older housing. (Similarly, the shortage of new cars during Covid resulted in more people buying used cars, driving up prices.)
It's the thing people find hardest to believe about the "ladder" - that upper costs can affect lower down; just counterintuitive, but so is about half of economics, I swear. Congrats on finding the case.